Legal Opinion

United States Coal & Coke Co. v. Cecil

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1930No. 6777PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Judge:

This action of ejectment involves only minerals. In the trial court a directed verdict was returned for the plaintiff for the possession in fee simple of the minerals described in the declaration, except two small parcels disclaimed by defendants. The defendants obtained this writ of error to the judgment entered upon the verdict.

The controversy centers closely around the following language appearing in a deed of Joseph Hatfield and wife to Henry R. Phillips, Trustee, October 15, 1889: “Witnesseth: That for and in consideration of the sum of Eighteen Hundred Dollars paid in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Adams v. AlkireWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Mylius v. Raine-Andrew Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Rutherford v. TracySupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  4. McDougal v. MusgraveWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Shreck v. PierceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Turpen v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Swope v. Pageton Pocahontas Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Vandetta v. YaneroWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API