Legal Opinion
Epstein v. Goldstein
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 25, 1940No. 35PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
This case was decided in November 1939. The opinion is reported in 2 Cir., 107 F.2d 755, 759. It concluded as follows: “The cause is remanded with directions to modify the judgment in conformity with this opinion. No costs are awarded to either party.” Thereafter the mandate of this court was filed in the district court but no judgment has been entered thereon. By the present motion the parties ask us to state what the mandate means. This is a proper method' of obtaining a clarification of the mandate, if clarification is necessary. Individual Drinking Cup Co. v. Public Service Cup Co., 2…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Individual Drinking Cup Co. v. Public Service Cup Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
3Cited by9 opinions
- E. L. Cord, Individually and Doing Business as Los Angeles Broadcasting Company, and v. Calvin J. Smith, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- National Ass'n of Motor Bus Owners v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Crane Co. v. American Standard, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Lack v. Western Loan & Building Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- National Association Of Motor Bus Owners v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.