Yates v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Judge.
The conviction was in a dry county for violation of the prohibition law. Code 1940, Tit. 29, § 98.
Locked in the “turtle back” of his automobile were thirty-six pints of whiskey which the defendant stated “belonged to him” — said “it was his whiskey.” He produced the key with which to unlock the compartment. This evidence was without dispute. The defendant elected not to offer any testimony, but rested upon conclusion of the State’s case.
Under the prevailing rule, there was no error in giving for the State the general affirmative charge, duly requested in writing. Where the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte GrimmettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Robertson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
- Holmes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
- Wood v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939
- McCleskey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Goolsby v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Walker v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955
- Lee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
- Scopolites v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Howard v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.