Crown v. Lepper

Plaintiff Richard Crown seeks to remove an action to this court because of newly discovered *875injuries for which he claims he cannot be compensated within the monetary jurisdiction of the City Court. Defendant, opposing, also cross-moves to vacate the plaintiff’s supplemental bill of particulars.

The defendant initially claims this motion to be procedurally defective in that it is made by a plaintiff in a nonexistent Supreme Court action. This may be so (Helfgott v. Tannen, 208 Misc. 335), and the application should have been made by way of petition, but the error is technical merely. In the…