Legal Opinion

City of Selma v. Mullen

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1871PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court of Shelby. Tried before Hon. Charles Pelham. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

This is an action “on account or verbal contract,” for services rendered by appellee for the sick in said city of Selma, during the years 1865 and 1866. The suit was originally brought in the city court of Selma, but afterwards, by consent of parties, the trial of the case was changed to the circuit court of Shelby. The complaint contains two counts. They are as follows:

1. “The plaintiff claims of the defendant the sum of forty-sis hundred dollars for work and labor done by the plaintiff for the defendant, at the request of said defendant, in the years 1864,1865, and 1866.”

2. “And plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  3. Providence Bank v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  4. Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  5. People ex rel. Attorney General v. Utica InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1818

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Gadsden v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  2. State Ex Rel. Glenn v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Wright v. PriceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Beck v. PuckettTennessee Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Panther Oil & Grease Manufacturing Co. v. Blount County Board of EducationAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API