Legal Opinion

Langendorf v. City of Urbana

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2001No. 90635PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

Section 7 — 1—46 of the Illinois Municipal Code (the Code) provides for a one-year statute of limitations for actions that “directly or indirectly” contest an annexation. 65 ILCS 5/7 — 1—46 (West 1998). The plaintiff, Michael C. Langendorf, filed this declaratory judgment action against the defendant, the City of Urbana (the City), challenging the zoning of two parcels of property that were rezoned by the City pursuant to annexation agreements between the City and the owners of those parcels. The plaintiff does not challenge the zoning of his own property. The circuit court of Champaign…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Kraft, Inc. v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Golla v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Niven v. SiqueiraIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Barragan v. Casco Design Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Village of Chatham v. County of SangamonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. In Re County TreasurerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. SMART GROWTH SUGAR GROVE v. Village of Sugar GroveAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API