Legal Opinion
Cardinal Sporting Goods Co. v. Eagleton
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided January 11, 1963No. 62 C 121(3)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REGAN, District Judge.
This action was brought under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281 and 2284, attacking the constitutionality of Missouri laws, RSMo 1959, Sections 563.690 to 563.730 (563.-690, 563.700 hereinafter referred to as “the Sabbath Breaking Laws” and 563.-720, 563.730 hereinafter referred to as “the Sunday Selling Laws”), V.A.M.S.
The Missouri Sunday Laws in their present form are as follows (RSMo 1959, Sections 563.690-563.730, V.A.M.S.):
“563.690. Sabbath breaking. Every person who shall either labor himself, or compel or permit his apprentice or servant, or any other person under his charge or…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wiesenfeld v. Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1973
- Home Depot, Inc., and Gaylord's National Corporation v. William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Gem Stores, Inc. v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963