New York Life Ins. v. Sparkman
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
Suing upon the double indemnity provision of a life insurance policy, plaintiff claimed that the death of the insured had resulted directly and independently of all other causes, from bodily injury effected solely through external, violent and accidental means. The defendant denied this.
There were no eye witnesses to the shooting, but the evidence, which was entirely circumstantial, established beyond question that the sole cause of the insured’s death was a self-inflicted pistol shot wound.
At the conclusion of the evidence, though both plaintiff and defendant moved…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Herron v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Travelers Ins. Co. v. WilkesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- ætna Life Ins. Co. v. TooleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1926
- New York Life Ins. v. TrimbleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Love v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey v. Robbins Coal Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Scales v. Prudential Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Ling v. EdenfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Pilot Life Ins. v. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Union Cent. Life Ins. v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940