Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. LH REALTY CORPORATION

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1956No. 40043PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKyle, J.

The L. H. Eealty Corporation, plaintiff in the court below, recovered a judgment against Max Goldberg, defendant in the court below, for the sum of $1,500 as rent due and unpaid for the months of October, November and December 1954, for the use of leased premises in the City of Meridian owned by the realty company and occupied by Max Goldberg during the 3-months period. From that judgment Max Goldberg has prosecuted this appeal.

The case was tried before a jury, and only two witnesses testified. Max Goldberg was called as a witness by the plaintiff for the purpose of cross-examination, and in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Spengler v. Stiles-Tull Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1909
  3. R. B. Tyler Co. v. Laurel Equipment Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Foucar v. HolbergSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mauck v. Columbus Hotel Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. St. Regis Pulp & Paper Corp. v. FloydMississippi Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Delta Wild Life & F., Inc. v. Bear Kelso Plant., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Kroger Co. v. Chimneyville Properties, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1991
  5. Continental Gin Co. v. FreemanDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API