Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Manning-Wallace

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 17, 2010No. S10Y0981Published

1ConcurrenceNahmias, Justice

In this disciplinary matter, attorney Nerrylle Manning-Wallace now admits that she “knew or should have known” that two documents she offered into evidence at a jury trial in superior court, and previously disclosed to her opposing party in discovery, were fabricated. To make matters worse, the falsified documents were not submitted on behalf of a client, but rather in a lawsuit that Manning-Wallace filed pro se, seeking damages for purported treatment of injuries she had sustained in an automobile accident. In other words, she intended to profit directly and personally from the false…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Krause v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  2. In Re SkandalakisSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  3. In the Interest of E. P. N.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. In Re ShehaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  5. Matter of FriedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API