Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. White
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 29, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-4662 (HLS)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAROKIN, District Judge.
Before the court is plaintiffs motion to strike most of the affirmative defenses asserted by the defendants to this action, including their defenses that the plaintiff has contributed to the losses at issue and that the plaintiff has failed to mitigate damages. Introduction
Aspects of the motion pending before the court raise fundamental questions regarding the duties and responsibilities of government agencies with respect to failed banking institutions. Specifically, plaintiffs motion to strike defendants’ failure to mitigate and contributory negligence…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver v. O'melveny & MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. 416.81 Acres of Land, Etc., and Mercantile National Bank of Indiana, as TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Jack H. Harrison and Frederick G. RixeyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Tonka Corp. v. Rose Art Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- North Penn Transfer, Inc. v. Victaulic Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Jurista v. Amerinox Processing, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Dann v. Lincoln National Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Krisa v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.