Legal Opinion
Dawn Warrick and Nathan Parrish v. Steve and Mitzi Stewart
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 28, 2015No. 92A03-1407-CC-257PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAILEY, Judge.
Case Summary
[1] Steve Stewart (“Stewart”) brought a negligence claim against Dawn Warrick (“Dawn”) and Nathan Parish (“Nathan”) (collectively, “the Warricks”) after Stewart’s motorcycle collided with the War-ricks’ loose dog, causing Stewart to suffer personal injury. 1 A jury found that Stewart was seventy percent at fault and accordingly returned a verdict for the War-ricks. After Stewart filed a motion to correct error, the trial court granted the motion, set aside the jury’s verdict, and ordered a new jury trial. We affirm.
Issue
[2] The Warricks present one issue for review:…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Memorial Hospital of South Bend, Inc. v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Nissen Trampoline Co. v. Terre Haute First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Barnard v. HimesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- DeVittorio v. Werker Bros., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Precision Screen MacHines, Inc. v. HixsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- M&S Steel Corp. v. Wendell H. Kemplen (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
- Marten Transport, Ltd., a Foreign Corporation, and Caroline Hurst v. Kathleen E. Lucas (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Mary Grigsby v. Martin's Super Markets, Inc. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- William Brandon, Jr. and Sarah Brandon v. Buddy & Pal's III, Inc., d/b/a Buddy & Pal's Place and Thomas WalkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016