Legal Opinion

City of Cape Girardeau v. Armstrong

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 18, 1967No. 32610PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDDY, Judge.

The City of Cape Girardeau (hereinafter referred to as City) brought this action, pursuant to the provisions of Section 71.015 RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S., (referred to as the Sawyer Act) seeking a declaratory judgment authorizing it to proceed as otherwise authorized by law in the annexation of approximately six to eight square miles of unincorporated land adjoining its present municipal borders. The defendants, inhabitants and owners of land in the area to be annexed, were sued as members of a class. Other persons living in the area proposed for annexation were permitted to intervene…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of St. Joseph v. HankinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. State v. City of North Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. State ex inf. Major v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. State Ex Inf. Mallett v. City of JoplinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. City of Olivette v. GraelerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cherry v. City of Hayti HeightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Peterson v. RoloffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. City of Joplin v. Village of Shoal Creek DriveMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. City of Perryville v. BrewerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. City of O'Fallon v. BethmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API