Legal Opinion

Edgar E. Chambers v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security Administration

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 27, 2004No. 03-7007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Appellant Edgar E. Chambers has submitted a bill of costs seeking taxable appellate expenses under Rule 39 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in conjunction with the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Mr. Chambers recently' obtained a favorable decision on his áppeal involving the denial of social security benefits. See Chambers v. Barn-hart, No. 03-7007, 2003 WL 22512073, — Fed.Appx. — (10th Cir. Nov.6, 2003) (unpublished) (reversing district court judgment that affirmed Commissioner’s denial of benefits and remanding for further administrative…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mary GOATCHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Mary Maida v. John J. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. James v. QuinlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vicki Wade v. Kilolo KijakaziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Larson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API