Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Campanaro Construction Company, No. 28 21 24 (Mar. 19, 1991)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided March 19, 1991No. 28 21 24Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (No. 126) The defendants Campanaro Construction Company and Robert O'Brien, in this action brought by the plaintiff Bruce Bailey for damages as a result of personal injuries, move for summary judgment which raises the issue of whether the motor vehicle exception under General Statutes 31-293a is applicable. Sec. 31-293a generally bars suits against fellow employees where worker's compensation is available to an injured employee except if "the action is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dias v. AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Davey v. Pepperidge Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Conti v. Rose Hill Poultry Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  4. Kiriaka v. AlterwitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API