Legal Opinion

Hearn v. Ruark

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 6, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAjmcihs, J.

This suit grows out of an alleged tomato contract between appellant, plaintiff below, who is a canner, and appellee, defendant below, who is alleged to have grown the tomatoes which are the subject of the suit.

On learning that the tomatoes were not to be delivered to him, plaintiff filed a bill for injunction to restrain defendant “his agents, servants, employees, children and members of his family, they and each of them,” “from selling, delivering or in anyway disposing of the said tomatoes except to the complainant.”

A preliminary injunction was granted, which was subsequently dissolved on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Semmes v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  2. Mundorff v. KilbournCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  3. Equitable Gas Light Co. v. Baltimore Coal Tar & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
  4. Phoenix Pad Manufacturing Co. v. RothCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  5. Hahn v. Concordia SocietyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Washington National ArenaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Md.-Nat'l Cap. P. & P. v. Wash. Nat'l ArenaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Hanlon v. LevinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  4. Seci, Inc. v. Chafitz, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Anshe Sephard Congregation v. WeisblattCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API