Philip A. Hunt Co. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge
These are appeals in trade-mark opposition proceedings.
The trade-marks of appellant, hereinafter described, being substantially the same and being used on identical goods, the opposition proceedings were consolidated in the Patent Office for the purpose ■of trial. Accordingly, the two appeals will be disposed of in one opinion.
Appellant’s mark, in appeal N>. 4815, consists of the term “GRAPH-O-LITH,” for use on chemicals for developing line and half-tone nqgativés. Appellant states in its application for registration, filed January 13, 1940, that it has used its mark “GRAPH-O-LITH” on its…
2Cited by3 opinions
- West Disinfecting Co. v. Lan-O-Sheen Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- Rite-Rite Mfg. Co. v. Rite-Craft Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Atlantic Seafood Packers v. Florida Fruit Canners, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948