Clairmont Development Co. v. Tri-State Culvert Manufacturing, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Presiding Judge.
In passing upon the trial judge’s grant of plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, we must consider the question whether the defendant was bound by one of his answers to plaintiffs interrogatories.
Suit was brought against the individual defendant and the corporate defendant of which the individual defendant was president. The grant of summary judgment allowed recovery against both. The individual defendant contends that only the corporate defendant was liable.
One of plaintiffs interrogatories queried: "what amount do you contend is due and owing to the plaintiff by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burnette Ford, Inc. v. HayesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Burnette Ford, Inc. v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Young v. DodsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Benn v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
3Cited by6 opinions
- Albitus v. Farmers & Merchants BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- J. E. M. Enterprises, Inc. v. Taco Pronto, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Ward v. SebrenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- McFarland v. Shoney's of Savannah South, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Albitus v. Farmers & Merchants BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.