Legal Opinion

Pollard v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 12, 1918PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Garrard Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

-Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas —

Affirming.

This suit was brought by appellee, J. I. Hamilton, against appellants, Clyde Pollard and Sallie Pollard, and their statutory guardian, they being infants, to procure the sale of a lot in the city of Lancaster, Kentucky, containing three and one-fourth acres, for purposes of division. The proceeding is one authorized by sub-section 2 of section 490 of the Civil Code of Practice, and in plaintiff’s pleading the necessary and proper allegations concerning possession and, the indivisibility of the land were made.

In the original petition it is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shelby v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
  2. Ellis v. Smith's GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Scott v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Finney v. FinneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. Moore v. Potter-Matlock Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bond v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Ohio Oil Co. v. WestCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  3. Foreman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  4. Grausz v. ConleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Asher Coal Mining Co. v. Howard's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API