Legal Opinion
Nicoud v. New York Life Ins.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 12, 1909Published
Action by Rose L. Nicoud against the New York Life Insurance Company.
1Per curiam
Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, because the findings of fact are inconsistent and irreconcilable. See Israel v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 158 N. Y. 624, 53 N. E. 517: Nickell v. Tracy, 184 N. Y. 386, 77 N. E. 391; City of Buffalo v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., 190 N. Y. 84, 82 N. E. 513, 16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 506. In this case the trial court has found all the controlling facts both ways.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Buffalo v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Israel v. . Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Nickell v. . TracyNew York Court of Appeals · 1906