Legal Opinion

Donaldson v. City of Bismarck

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1942No. File 6718, 6719Published

1Opinion

(On petition for rehearing.)

Christianson, J.

Defendant has petitioned for a rehearing “on the ground and for the reason that the court has overlooked material law and facts in the above entitled action, namely:

1st. That this is an action for damages in tort and not an action in condemnation proceedings.

2nd. That interest is not allowed as a matter of law under our statute in cases of this kind.

3rd. That there was neither pleading nor proof, nor claim by the-plaintiff for interest.

4th. That even if interest should be allowed, it is excessive under chapter 150, Laws 1937.”

The contentions thus…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. United States v. North American Transportation & Trading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Brown v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Shoshone Tribe of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API