Chambers v. New York Life Insurance
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
Motion for judgment on pleadings. The sufficiency of the counterclaim is to be tested on this motion, and, if held insufficient, assuming the truth of the allegations contained therein, then plaintiff is entitled to judgment as prayed for in the complaint. The defendant by its counterclaim seeks to rescind that part of the policy *562which provides for disability and double indemnity. The defendant tenders the amount received for these special benefits. The policies specifically except the incontestability for double indemnity and disability, and this exception is authorized by section 101,…
2Cited by10 opinions
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Trousdell v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Terry v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Braun v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.