Legal Opinion

Ackerman-Beardsley-Bennett, Inc. v. Baker

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided November 30, 1954No. File No. 13776Published

1Opinion of the CourtFitzGerald, J.

The within action is one in contract. The plaintiff seeks to recover damages of the defendant for the latter’s refusal to fulfill the terms of an oral agreement regarding the purchase of a quantity of citrus pulp. Upon the joining of issues the following facts were disclosed at the trial: On October 29, 1953, an agent of the plaintiff in person obtained from the defendant an oral order for two carloads of citrus pulp, each in the amount of twenty tons, at cost of $61 a ton. The particular brand ordered has the trade name of Suni-Citrus and is used in the feeding of cattle. It was agreed that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hodges v. KowingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
  2. Harmonie Club, Inc. v. SmirnowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Munzenmaier v. QuickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API