Legal Opinion

Lawlor Et Al., Trading as Independent Poster Exchange, v. National Screen Service Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 25, 1957No. 632PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree with the Court of Appeals that the motion for summary judgment should have been denied. However, in our view, this disposition of the case made it unnecessary for the Court of Appeals to pass on any other issue than that of the per se invalidity of exclusive contracts under the Sherman Act. In order that the District Court not be bound by the consideration the Court of Appeals gave to the remaining issues, and without reaching any of the same, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari, vacate the judgments, and remand the cause to the District Court for trial.

Mr. Justice…

2Cited by31 opinions

  1. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke & Liquors, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. Sound Ship Building Corp v. Bethlehem Steel Company (Incorporated)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. The Elder-Beerman Stores Corp. v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  4. Francis G. Bragen v. Hudson County News Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  5. Joseph E. Seagram and Sons, Inc., and the House of Seagram, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke and Liquors, Ltd., McKesson and Robbins, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke and Liquors, Ltd., Barton Distilling Company v. Hawaiian Oke and Liquors, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API