Legal Opinion
Arrington v. Awbrey
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided April 11, 1940No. 13245PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
The first four grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial complain of the court’s ruling •upon the admissibility of evidence, but do not state the name of the witness whose testimony was admitted. This court has rulejd more than once that grounds of a motion for a new trial complaining of the admission or rejection of evidence should show, in order to be complete, the name of the witness whose testimony was admitted or rejected. Sims v. Sims, 131 Ga. 262 (62 S. E. 192); Hunter v. State, 148 Ga. 566 (97 S. E. 523); Plemmons v. Sharp, 156 Ga. 571 (3) (119 S. E.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. TiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Askew v. AmosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Sims v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Gill v. WillinghamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cotton v. John W. Eshelman & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Mercantile National Bank v. AldridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Dearing v. A. R. III, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Griffin v. WelchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Bowman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.