Legal Opinion

Smith v. Farrington

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 17, 1942PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.

On report. In this bill in equity the plaintiffs (executrix, devisees, and legatees under the will of Avis A. Farrington, deceased wife of the defendant) seek specific performance of an alleged antenuptial agreement. The defendant filed a general demurrer which joined raises the issue whether the bill sets forth facts justifying relief in equity. Whitehouse Equity Practice, Sec. 331, page 363.

The facts alleged in the bill may be stated briefly. On December 16, 1931, the defendant, a widower, married Avis A. Stearns, a widow, each having living children by former marriages. Following their…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. De Cicco v. . SchweizerNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. McAnnulty v. McAnnultyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Rowell v. BarberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Moore v. HarrisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Kohl v. FrederickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API