Cooper v. State

Boggs, Judge.

Adam Cooper appeals from his convictions for possession of a Schedule I controlled substance (N-Benzylpiperazine or “BZP” )1 and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. He contends insufficient evidence supports his convictions. We disagree and affirm.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the record shows that three police officers in uniform were patrolling an apartment complex on bicycles “for illegal drug sales.” When the officers approached Building 15, they saw Cooper standing in front of it with two men facing him. One of the men reached into his…