Legal Opinion

Singer v. Lichtman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 29, 1937Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order denying motion of defendant Lichtman to dismiss the complaint reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Since the plaintiff is not the borrower, she may not maintain an action in equity for the cancellation or recovery of the usurious instruments without alleging payment, or a tender of payment, of the amount actually received by the deceased. (Buckingham v. Corning, 91 N. Y. 525; Lubetkin v. Stern & Co., Inc., 223 App. Div. 770.) In the absence of such allegations the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Buckingham v. . CorningNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Lubetkin v. D. S. Stern & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API