Legal Opinion

State v. Wendling

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 26, 1974No. 44134PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of exhibiting obscene materials in violation of the obscenity ordinance of the city of Minneapolis, Minneapolis Code of Ordinances, § 870.080.

Since the alleged criminal acts of defendant took place before our decision in State v. Welke, 298 Minn. 402, 216 N. W. 2d 641 (1974), he did not have the clear notice of legislative proscription that Welke requires.

As this court stated in State v. Carlson, 298 Minn. 415, 416, 216 N. W. 2d 650, 651 (1974), decided the same day as Welke:

“* * * [W]e prefer to err, if at all, on the side of that fair notice vouchsafed in Welke. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WelkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sheets v. Letnes, Marshall & Fiedler, Ltd.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Berg v. HoganNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Lumpkin v. StreifelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API