Legal Opinion
In re the Marriage of Hoseth
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 11, 2003No. 20729-3-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Brown, C.J. —
A superior court commissioner granted James Hoseth’s motion to modify the parenting plan for his son with Mary Beth Hoseth/Zemke, James’s former wife and the residential parent. The superior court denied Mary Beth’s1 revision motion. Mary Beth appeals contending the *567superior court erred in its application of the minor modification provisions of RCW 26.09.260(5). After interpreting the statute for the first time, we affirm.
FACTS
James and Mary Beth married in February 1994. Cody was born in September 1994. The parties separated in 1996. In July 1996, they agreed to a parenting plan…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re the Marriage of KonzenWashington Supreme Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re the Marriage of TomsovicCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- In re the Custody of HallsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- In re the Marriage of ParkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- In Re The Parentage And Support Of: C.m., Cassandra Weisenberger, App v. Tyler Mittge, RespCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- In re Marriage of HosethWashington Supreme Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.