Thomas L. Esmond v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATHIAS, Judge.
Thomas L. Esmond (“Esmond”) brings this interlocutory appeal from the order of the Newton Superior Court requiring him to undergo a psychiatric evaluation by the State’s mental health expert without the presence of counsel. Because the Indiana Supreme Court has held that a defendant who raises an insanity defense has no right to the presence of counsel during a psychiatric examination, we affirm.
*214Facts and Procedural History-
According to the charging information, on December 18, 2012, Esmond stabbed an eight-year-old boy in the chest and arms at a home in Kentland,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Buchanan v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Malinski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Michael Miller v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Matthew S. Simons v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018