Legal Opinion
Johnson v. City of Seattle
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 17, 2007No. 05-35319PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge.
Michael A. Johnson and ten other persons (collectively the “Pioneer Square Plaintiffs”) appeal from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Seattle, Paul Schell (former Mayor of Seattle), and R. Gil Ker-likowske (Chief of the Seattle Police Department) (collectively “Defendants”). The Pioneer Square Plaintiffs contend that the district court erred in dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim because the Defendants’ change in police enforcement policy violated their Fourteenth Amendment right to due process by affirmatively placing them…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Linda K. Wood v. Steven C. Ostrander Neil MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Shanks v. DresselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Juan Hernandez v. City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Campbell v. State of Washington Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Donnitta Sinclair v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Patricia Polanco v. Ralph DiazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.