Stone v. State
Michigan Court of Appeals
1DissentCollins, J.
I respectfully dissent. As I read the plain language of MCL 38.19f(3), that subsection constitutes a condition that retirement system members accept if they accept the state’s offer of early retirement under the sera. I do not agree that *532the requirement in MCL 38.19f(3) that payment for accrued sick leave be made in monthly installments, rather than in a lump sum as would normally occur under the Michigan Civil Service Commission (MCSC) compensation plan and MCSC rules, converted the payments for accumulated sick leave into a tax-exempt retirement benefit under MCL 38.40(1).
While I…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Adrian School District v. Michigan Public School Employees' Retirement SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Detroit v. Detroit Commercial CollegeMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Advo-Systems, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Howard v. Clinton Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Alma Piston Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.