Legal Opinion
Orloff v. Lovett
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 17, 1951No. 3851PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKLAND, District Judge.
Petitioner herein, Stanley J. Orloff, is a private in the United States Army, having been inducted into the army on July 26, 1951. At the time of his induction he was twenty-seven years of age. His petition complains that he was inducted in violation of 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 454(a), or in the alternative that if he was inducted under 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 454(i) as a medical doctor, then he alleges that he is entitled td serve as a Doctor of Medicine in the Army
The jurisdictional question in this cas< must be decided before the merits can be considered. Petitioner…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. EisentragerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Ahrens v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Eisentrager v. ForrestalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- HIROTA v. MacARTHUR, GENERAL OF THE ARMY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States of America Ex Rel. Arthur Rudick v. Melvin Laird, Secretary of Defense, and Stanley Resor, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States Ex Rel. Lohmeyer v. LairdDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1970
- Orloff v. Willoughby, Colonel, U.S. ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Orloff v. Willoughby, Colonel, U.S. ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952