O'Neale v. Hershoff
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentGersten, Judge
I respectfully dissent.
The majority opinion determines that the trial court interpreted section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1991), too narrowly and entered summary judgment prematurely. Since section 768.125 is a limiting statute, and since the appellant had ten months to allege facts sufficient to withstand the motion for summary judgment, I respectfully dissent.
Appellees are the franchisee/owner and related parties of the service station at which Lou Last, a minor, purchased beer. Appellant, Sondra O’Neale, is the parent and guardian of the minor who was a passenger injured in an automobile…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bankston v. BrennanSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Migliore v. Crown Liquors of Broward, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Reina v. Gingerale Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Burson v. Gate Petroleum Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Colon v. LaraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.