Legal Opinion · Dissent

O'Neale v. Hershoff

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 19, 1993No. 92-2176Published

1DissentGersten, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

The majority opinion determines that the trial court interpreted section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1991), too narrowly and entered summary judgment prematurely. Since section 768.125 is a limiting statute, and since the appellant had ten months to allege facts sufficient to withstand the motion for summary judgment, I respectfully dissent.

Appellees are the franchisee/owner and related parties of the service station at which Lou Last, a minor, purchased beer. Appellant, Sondra O’Neale, is the parent and guardian of the minor who was a passenger injured in an automobile…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bankston v. BrennanSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Migliore v. Crown Liquors of Broward, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1984
  3. Reina v. Gingerale Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Burson v. Gate Petroleum Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Colon v. LaraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API