State v. Anderson
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Donald Anderson was convicted by a jury of sexual contact with a child under the age of sixteen, in violation of SDCL 22-22-7. Anderson appeals arguing that his arraignment was inadequate. Additionally, he appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for a new trial. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
[¶ 2.] On May 12, 2011, Anderson was arrested on the charge of sexual contact with a child under the age of sixteen, in violation of SDCL 22-22-7. As indicated by an initial appearance form, Anderson appeared on May 13, 2011, before a clerk magistrate where he was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Nachtigall v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. CarothersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MitchellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HankinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. KingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014