Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 2013No. 26388PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Donald Anderson was convicted by a jury of sexual contact with a child under the age of sixteen, in violation of SDCL 22-22-7. Anderson appeals arguing that his arraignment was inadequate. Additionally, he appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for a new trial. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

[¶ 2.] On May 12, 2011, Anderson was arrested on the charge of sexual contact with a child under the age of sixteen, in violation of SDCL 22-22-7. As indicated by an initial appearance form, Anderson appeared on May 13, 2011, before a clerk magistrate where he was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Nachtigall v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. CarothersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. MitchellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HankinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State v. KingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API