Legal Opinion

Strauss v. Friend

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 11, 1884PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Debtor and Creditor. Vendor and Purchaser. Husband and Wife. Married Women. Promissory Notes. Before Judge Simmons. Bibb Superior - Court. April Term, 1884' Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, Chief Justice.

The defendant in error being a married woman, made her promissory note to one Samuel Gunhouse; it was, after *783its maturity, transferred to the plaintiff in error; to secure it, she made a mortgage on real estate in Macon, which was transferred with the note; on the petition by the plaintiff in error to foreclose this mortgage, the defendant pleaded that it -was given as security for the debt of another, and did not bind her; if not, that it was a voluntary gift to her son-in-law of a promise to pay and without consideration, and therefore nudum pactum. The court below…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Howard v. SimpkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. Capital Bank v. RutherfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  3. Veal v. HurtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Magid v. BeaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Temples v. Equitable Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Southern Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Jones v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Strickland v. VanceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API