James Payton v. John Digiacomo and Daveen Digiacomo
Court of Appeals of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
■ MULLINS, J.
John and Daveen DiGiacomo appeal from a district court order denying them application for attorney fees pursuant to a remedies clause of a purchase agreement with James Payton. Payton brought a breach-of-contract claim against the DiGia-comos, and a jury found for the DiGiaco-mos. The DiGiacomos contend they are entitled to attorney fees as the prevailing party in the action. The district court denied their claim and we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS.
Appellant sellers, John and Daveen DiGiacomo (DiGiacomos), 1 sold a home pursuant to a purchase agreement to appellee…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- NevadaCare, Inc. v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Fashion Fabrics of Iowa, Inc. v. Retail Investors Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Walsh v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Jensen v. SattlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- State v. StoenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Daniel Felt and Susan Kern v. David Felt and Felt Farms LLCCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2019
- Goosmann Law Firm, P.L.C. v. Hirschbach Motor Lines, Inc., and GR Equipment Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2024
- John Deppe and Deppe JJ, LLC F/K/A Doerscher-Deppe, LLC v. Douglas H. Deppe and Kim Doerscher-DeppeCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2017
- Michael Morrisey v. All Iowa Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2025
- Minnesota Lawyers Mutual v. Rasmussen, Nelson & Wonio, PLCCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.