Legal Opinion
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Kirkpatrick
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided May 15, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Proceeding to compel accounting and payment of the petitioner’s claim.
1Opinion of the Court
McElrot, Sp. S.
This is a special proceeding instituted by the petitioner to compel the administrator c. t. a. to render an account and pay the claim of the petitioner.
The records in the Surrogate’s Oourt of Orange county show that letters testamentary were granted by this court to Franklin *72Varney, the sole executor named in the will of Sarah D. Kirkpatrick, deceased, on the 19th day of May, 1876, and that on the 8th' day of January, 1877, an inventory was filed by said executor, amounting to the sum of $2,121.72, or thereabouts.
It further appears that the said Franklin Varney died without…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ferrin v. . MyrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Barry v. . LambertNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Schmittler v. . SimonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- New v. . NicollNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Borst v. . CoreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of Van VoorheesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1907
- Sanford v. Story, New York County Courts1896