Legal Opinion

Atwell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 4, 1995No. 94-867Published

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Judge.

During Cornell Atwell’s trial on possession of cocaine with intent to deliver, Officer Gibson (one of the officers involved in the arrest) answered the following question on cross-examination:

Q. So your testimony is you didn’t see anything that Mr. Atwell did, correct?

A. Not this time.

This response could, of course, imply to the jury that Officer Gibson had previously observed Mr. Atwell doing something illegal concerning cocaine.

Atwell’s motion for mistrial was denied. We reverse.

The court did give a curative instruction which, under normal circumstances, might have been…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Salvatore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Hellman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API