Legal Opinion
S S v. State
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided January 22, 1973PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POMEROY, Justice.
These consolidated cases are before us on report pursuant to Rule 72(b), Maine Rules of Civil Procedure.
The Agreed Statement describes the issues presented as follows:
“1. Whether the offense for which g**** g**** and L**** B**** were adjudged juvenile offenders is unconstitutionally vague, and thus, their commitments are in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article 1, § 6-A of the Maine Constitution.
“2. Whether S**** S**** and L**** B**** were adjudged juvenile offenders in violation of the Due Process Clause…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Danforth v. State Department of Health and WelfareSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Blondheim v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. GleasonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Matter of BenoitSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- State v. FLINT H.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.