Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Osage County Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Worten

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 17, 1933No. 24681Published

1Dissent

OSBORN, X

(dissenting). In dissenting from the majority opinion, I desire to express my views.

Let us take a brief glance at the act and note its purpose and effects as disclosed by its salient provisions. It purports to be aimed at a temporary situation, in that, by its express terms, it is to be in force for only a period of two years after its passage and approval. It does not purport to amend any existing law, nor to repeal the same, but is supplementary thereof. Its terms apply to actions heretofore and hereafter filed, thus attaching itself to contracts and obligations theretofore…

2Cases cited102 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API