Legal Opinion

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports

Decided June 8, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Richard A. Mullaney General Counsel City of Jacksonville 117 West Duval Street, Suite 480 Jacksonville, Florida 32302

Dear Mr. Mullaney:

Your office has asked substantially the following questions:

1. May the county determine the offenses for which the $3 assessment authorized by section 938.19, Florida Statutes, may be imposed?

2. May the funds received from the $3 assessment pursuant to section 938.19, Florida Statutes, be applied to other programs or go into the county's general revenue fund?

In sum:

1. Section 938.19, Florida Statutes, does not authorize the county to choose the offenses…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thayer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Alsop v. PierceSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  3. Dickinson v. StoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  4. Drury v. HardingSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  5. Supreme Forest Woodmen Circle v. Hobe Sound Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API