Legal Opinion
Naderhoff v. Prudence Mutual Life Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 20, 1938No. Civ. No. 5976PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The appellant in this action is a California Mutual Life Insurance Company organized under sections 452a-453 of the Civil Code, which sections are now supplanted by the Insurance Code of the state of California beginning with section 10,640.
On the 8th day of December, 1932, being at a time after the organization of said Mutual Life Insurance Association, August Naderhoff, then the husband of the plaintiff in this action, became a member of the appellant-association. The certificate issued to him was for the maximum sum of $2,000, with a provision contained therein that if death were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boyer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Canfield v. Great Camp of the Knights of the MaccabeesMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Pool v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Pencille v. State Farmers' Mutual Hail InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Barrows v. Mutual Reserve Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gaylord v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946