Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Reuss v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 12, 1995No. C-940134PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hildebrandt, Presiding Judge.
The issue presented in this case is whether the Home Rule Amendment of the Ohio Constitution allows a charter city to circumvent the provisions of R.C. 124.38
as it pertains to the transfer of an employee’s unused accumulated sick leave. We hold that it does not and that the city must comply with the transfer provision.
Relator-appellant, Mark A. Reuss, is a member of the fire division of the city of Cincinnati. On February 4, 1993, he filed a complaint against respondentsappellees, the city of Cincinnati; Gerald Newfarmer, the city manager; Betty M. Baker, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weir v. RimmelinOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Ebert v. Stark County Board of Mental RetardationOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. Villari v. City of Bedford HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State ex rel. Adkins v. SobbOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- South Euclid Fraternal Order of Police v. D'AmicoOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State ex rel. Municipal Construction Equipment Operators' Labor Council v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals · 1996