Legal Opinion

United States v. Stephen Rogers

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 29, 2012No. 11-1573UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Stephen Rogers was convicted of knowingly transferring obscene matter to a minor (“Count 2”); knowingly receiving child pornography (“Count 3”); and enticing a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing a visual depiction of such conduct (“Count 4”).

He appeals his conviction on Count 2, arguing that the image he transferred does not satisfy the legal definition of obscenity. He also challenges his convictions on Counts 3 and 4, arguing, first, that the district court erred by trying all four counts in a single trial. Suggesting that the jury misconstrued…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HillsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
  2. United States v. Spencer SalcedoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  3. Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. Weems v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API