United States v. Stephen Rogers
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Stephen Rogers was convicted of knowingly transferring obscene matter to a minor (“Count 2”); knowingly receiving child pornography (“Count 3”); and enticing a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing a visual depiction of such conduct (“Count 4”).
He appeals his conviction on Count 2, arguing that the image he transferred does not satisfy the legal definition of obscenity. He also challenges his convictions on Counts 3 and 4, arguing, first, that the district court erred by trying all four counts in a single trial. Suggesting that the jury misconstrued…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. HillsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
- United States v. Spencer SalcedoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Weems v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2024