United States of America David E. Mitchell, Revenue Office of the Internal Revenue Service v. Roger L. Sharp
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
The fifth amendment exists, in part, to “assure that an individual is not compelled to produce evidence which later may be used against him as an accused in a criminal action.” Maness v. Meyers, 419 U.S. 449, 461, 95 S.Ct. 584, 592, 42 L.Ed.2d 574 (1975). This case raises the question whether the fifth amendment provided a taxpayer with a basis for refusing to answer questions propounded by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in the course of an investigation of possible civil liability. The district court held that it did not provide that protection and ordered the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States of America and L. Simmons, Revenue Officer, of Internal Revenue Service v. Alberto E. ArgomanizCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Davis v. LehaneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- Johnson v. FabianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- United States v. BodwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.