Legal Opinion

Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. Bird

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1888No. 13,344PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Randolph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

Our code provides that a party may be relieved from a judgment taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect; and also, that for any error of law appearing in the proceedings and *218judgment, or for material new matter discovered since its rendition, a party may have a review of a judgment taken against him. R. S. 1881, sections 396, 616.

This proceeding, instituted by appellant, can not be regarded as an application or proceeding under either of the above sections of the code. It .does not purport to be, but invokes an exercise of the inherent powers of the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Earle v. EarleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Cook v. WoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Hays v. RegerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Busenbarke v. RameyIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burrell v. JeanIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Hutts v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Karr v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Brake v. PayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. State v. LewWashington Supreme Court · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API