Butler v. Raugh

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 AT SEATTLE 8 AMELIA BUTLER, CASE NO. C19-964RSM 9 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL 10 v. 11 SI HO RAUGH and MS. CANTY-BASHAM, 12 Defendants. 13 14 This matter is before the Court sua sponte following consideration of Plaintiff’s Amended 15 Complaint. Dkt. #28. Having reviewed the Amended Complaint, the Court finds that it lacks 16 subject matter jurisdiction to consider the action and dismisses Plaintiff’s claims without 17 prejudice. 18 Plaintiff asserts a variety of tort claims purportedly arising from a hair treatment…