Legal Opinion

Carr v. Doan Savings & Loan Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1925No. 18398PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The legal question involved in this case is as follows: How shall interest be figured on a note and mortgage given to secure future advances to be made for the purpose of building construction, when the note and mortgage bear interest from the date thereof, but the sums advanced thereunder were paid out long after the execution of the note and mortgage, and when only-part of the sum upon the face of the note was ever advanced?

Throughout this opinion, as the parties stand in the same position as in the court below, the plaintiff in error will be called the plaintiff, and the defendant in error…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Main v. CasserlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Jourolmon v. EwingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  3. Campbell Printing Press & Man. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  4. Miller v. CavanaughCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  5. Conners v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heidelberg College v. National City BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Prepakt Concrete Co. v. Koski Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Bieber v. RiebelPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1939
  4. Squire v. OerterTuscarawas County Probate Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API